Chemical treated IPM strategies for insect pests of cauliflower vegetable crop

Abstract


Sahito, HA, Memon, SA Kaleri, NH, Mal, B Dhaunro, AA and Kaleri, S

In order to compare the population of insect pests and predators under IPM and chemical control application in cauliflower, the studies were carried out during the year 2010-2011. Riverm (Biopesticide) along with farmyard manure (FYM), Chrysoperla carnea and Trichograma chilonis were used as IPM strategies. While, Confidor 20SL and Prophenophos 50EC pesticides were applied for controlling cauliflower insect pests. The data of both the plots were compared with Check plot. The results indicated that lowest activities of all insect pests were recorded in non-IPM except whitefly. The overall mean population 23.29, 3.32, 1.92, 0.36 and 0.09 per leaf/plant of thrip, whitefly, aphid, diamond backmoth and semilooper were recorded in non-IPM while, their populations 27.40, 3.17, 2.25, 0.77 and 0.12, respectively were recorded in IPM plot as compared to check plot where their populations were recorded as 47.22, 8.88, 7.72, 1.18 and 0.38, respectively. In contrast to pest population, the predators, parasitoid were found more active in check plot. In check plot the population of predators such as spiders, paedeurs, zigzag beetle, Chrysoperla carnea and Trichograma chilonis were recorded as 0.119, 0.076, 0.073, 0.043 and 0.016, respectively. However their populations 0.17, 0.06, 0.05, 0.26 and 0.005, respectively were recorded in IPM plot. The T-test showed significant different in pest and predators population between IPM and non-IPM and between non-IPM and check plot except parasitoid which non-significantly appeared in IPM and non-IPM plots.

Share this article

Awards Nomination

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Indexed In
  • CAS Source Index (CASSI)
  • HINARI
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Open J Gate
  • EMBASE
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Academic Keys
  • ResearchBible
  • Airiti
  • CiteFactor
  • AGRIS
  • Open Academic Journals Index (OAJI)
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • Access to Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA)
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data
  • European Federation for Information Technology in Agriculture (EFITA)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Advanced Science Index
  • Scientific Indexing Services (SIS)
  • Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF)
  • Scholar Article Journal Index (SAIF)
  • Euro Pub
  • Universitat Vechta Library
  • Leipzig University Library
  • Max Planck Institute
  • WZB
  • ZB MED
  • Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin
  • Bibliothekssystem Universität Hamburg
  • PubMed
  • Portico
  • Journal Factor
  • ISEEK
  • Eurasian Scientific Journal Index
  • JournalGuide
  • Jifactor
  • AGRICOLA (National Agricultural Library)
  • EconPapers (RePEc)
  • IDEAS (RePEc)
  • RePEc
  • NASS
  • Biological Abstracts (Clarivate Analytics)
  • FSTA - Food Science and Technology Abstracts (IFIS)
  • Global Health (CABI)
  • Julkaisufoorumi Publication Forum (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies)