How responsibility for history was lost: Anti synthesis of advanced criminal law

Abstract


Napoleon Rene Dumas

Some writings in philosophy of history, legal sociology, law and economics have speculated, with more or less academic rigor, that history of crime and punishment might be synthesized and explained in a short sentence. From Marx to Durkheim, these thinkers seem to believe that penal evolution merely translates a political expression of power. But by changing the scholarly point of view, one might just see the exact opposite. As the meaning of penal system became gradually saturated, and consequences of punishment became more and more incomprehensible, postmodern historiography can reverse this synthesis and tell the tale of how all ownership of penal history was lost, assuming it was ever possessed.

Share this article

Awards Nomination

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Indexed In
  • Index Copernicus
  • Academic Keys
  • CiteFactor
  • Open Academic Journals Index (OAJI)
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • Advanced Science Index
  • Scientific Indexing Services (SIS)
  • Leipzig University Library
  • GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access
  • Bibliothekssystem Universität Hamburg
  • Eurasian Scientific Journal Index
  • Academic Resource Index