Abstract

Marietu, Tenuche

Leadership succession in liberal democratic regimes is expected to take place under an electoral process that can be adjudged as free and fair and where citizens exercise their inalienable right to elect leaders of their choice. It can however correctly be inferred from President Olusegun Obasanjo’s rhetoric prior to the 2007 general elections in Nigeria that the option for citizens to determine who rules them was foreclosed as he was determined to select his own successor. This is evidenced in the nature of the public statements and speeches that he made and the thrust of which tended to be abusive, intimidating, authoritarian and threatening. The President’s rhetoric naturally evoked responses from the informed public with grave implications for the nature and conduct of the elections. The outcome of the elections has been adjudged by both National and International observers as “deeply flawed” as the entire process was marked by irregularities and violence with serious implications for the fledging democratic institutions and culture being built in Nigeria. The concern of this paper is to examine the relationship between the rhetoric of the President, as documented in purposefully selected Nigerian dailies, the reactions and counter rhetoric of leading political opposition leaders, institutions and agencies that are involved in the electoral process and the nature of the conduct of the elections and results.